full tilt vs pokerstars freerolls?

[sweeta]

usual pokerstars freerolls are satellites and for 12000 people and only 99 win a ticket full tilt freerolls not as often as pokerstars and only for 2700 but top 27 win $$ without any satellites...which one do u think is better.. which one do u prefer

[sitnbitch]

Free rolls suck well atleast those ones do. Both ways suck.Full Tilt runs only a few but you have a better shot at winning something. PokerStars runs a crap load of the astronomer things that take 4-5 hrs just to get a ticket. Then you play another 2 hrs to make 60 cents. If you win it is kinda a bit bet like 250 bucks but thats like 10 hrs of work. and like i said if you just squeeze into the money then you wasted like 7 hrs fo 60 cents. Look For the special freerolls like the world cup of poker and the hockey freerolls. They pay much better. Good Luck at the tables

[King Cobra]

My answer is neither. You're far better off playing micro entry tournaments where there is a real prize pool. Freerolls are for entertainment purposes only and the expected value even for very good players is a few pennies for an hour or two of work. Not a good return for your time invested. So like I said it's for entertainment. Poker pro Chris Ferguson played these for many months before he was able to win a couple bucks and I do mean a couple bucks. He was out to show how you can build a poker roll from nothing but the lesson was that you really need to avoid trying to do this no matter how good you are. You could get a paper route and use the pay for one week to get at a level of money you would take years to get to by playing these turkeys.King Cobra Pokerhttp://kingcobrapoker.com